MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The state Supreme Court has deadlocked on whether the Legislature properly banned a legal theory that allowed dozens of lead paint lawsuits to proceed.
Legislators in 2013 passed a law barring attorneys from using the risk contribution theory as a basis for pending lead paint poisoning lawsuits. The theory apportions liability based on a manufacturer’s market share, enabling lawsuits even if the plaintiffs aren’t sure which manufacturer’s paint poisoned them.
Attorneys in one pending case argued lawmakers couldn’t apply the prohibition retroactively.
One justice didn’t participate and the vote was 3-3. An appellate court that had been asked earlier to decide the case but refused now must take it up.
- Posted April 18, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lead paint case back to lower court
headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- Protecting Attorney-Client Relationships: ABA advocacy helps safeguard the right to effective assistance of counsel
- Did ‘corporate speak’ and PowerPoint lead to complacency at GM?
- Ex-employee sues Sheppard Mullin over cyberattack exposing sensitive personal data
- Ropes & Gray allows more attorneys to count AI testing toward billable hours
- Plaintiff who filed fraudulent case, trashed desktop computer hit with sanctions
- Man who threatened Supreme Court justices avoids prison time
