ST. LOUIS (AP) — The Missouri Court of Appeals is being asked to decide whether a divorced St. Louis County couple’s two frozen embryos are property or human beings with constitutional rights.
Jalesia McQueen, 44, is suing to be able to use the embryos, which have been stored for six years, to have more children. Ex-husband, Justin Gadberry, 34, doesn’t want to have more children with McQueen and doesn’t believe he should be required to reproduce.
The two signed an agreement in 2010 that would give McQueen the embryos if they divorced, but Gadberry sought to prevent that from happening when the pair did split.
St. Louis County Family Court Commissioner Victoria McKee ruled that the embryos were “marital property” and gave joint custody to the estranged couple, which required McQueen and Gadberry to agree on the embryos’ future use.
Attorneys argued the case recently before the Missouri Court of Appeals.
McQueen’s appeal argues that Missouri law defines embryos as humans created at conception, giving her embryos a right to life. She also claims the lower court’s decision improperly invalidated her right to them under the pre-divorce agreement.
Gadberry’s lawyer, Tim Schlesinger, says giving the embryos to McQueen would violate his client’s right not to reproduce.
McQueen and Gadberry have 8-year-old twins from in vitro fertilization, and she has a 2-year-old son with another man.
- Posted June 07, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Appeals court to decide frozen embryo dispute
headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- Protecting Attorney-Client Relationships: ABA advocacy helps safeguard the right to effective assistance of counsel
- Did ‘corporate speak’ and PowerPoint lead to complacency at GM?
- Ex-employee sues Sheppard Mullin over cyberattack exposing sensitive personal data
- Ropes & Gray allows more attorneys to count AI testing toward billable hours
- Plaintiff who filed fraudulent case, trashed desktop computer hit with sanctions
- Man who threatened Supreme Court justices avoids prison time




