––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted February 13, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Enforceability issues focus of firm's seminar

Miller Canfield will present "Preserving + Enforcing Your Non-Competes" at its Troy office on Wednesday, March 7, from 8 to 9:30 a.m.
Miller Canfield litigator Soni Mithani will address enforceability issues and concerns with non-competition provisions in agreements including the factors affecting enforceability of non-competes, recovery of damages for breach of these provisions and strategies for drafting effective non-compete terms. This complimentary briefing is ideal for in-house counsel, HR personnel, risk officers, CEOs and CFOs.
Space is limited. Advance registration required by Monday, March 5. There is no cost to attend. To register, visit www.millercanfield.com and click on "News-Events."
For questions, contact Sandy Bera at 248-267-3345 or bera@millercanfield.com.
Published: Mon, Feb 13, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case