- Posted May 28, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court says video testimony OK in trial

GRAND RAPIDS (AP) -- The Michigan Supreme Court says the rights of a convicted sex offender were not violated when two out-of-town witnesses testified by video.
The court's 5-2 decision last Thursday overturns a ruling by the Michigan appeals court. James Buie claimed his right to confront witnesses was violated during a trial in Kent County.
Republicans on the Supreme Court say there was no objection placed on the record during the trial. Buie's attorney agreed to have the witnesses appear by live video because she still could cross-examine them.
Justice Diane Hathaway only agreed with the result of the Supreme Court case. Justices Marilyn Kelly and Michael Cavanagh say the convenience of video doesn't trump the rights of criminal defendants.
Buie is serving a life sentence.
Published: Mon, May 28, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone