- Posted July 13, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Judge won't revisit Detroit financial deal lawsuit

LANSING (AP) -- A judge won't reconsider an earlier ruling that dismissed a lawsuit challenging a financial stability agreement between Detroit Mayor Dave Bing and the state of Michigan.
Detroit Corporation Counsel Krystal Crittendon had asked Ingham County Circuit Judge William Collette to take another look at the ruling he made last month.
Collette denied her motion Tuesday. He ruled on June 13 that Crittendon didn't receive permission to sue.
Crittendon said the consent deal with the state violated the city's charter based on $220 million in revenue sharing and other items that she said Michigan owes Detroit. Gov. Rick Snyder has denied that claim.
The two sides signed the agreement as an alternative to the imposition of a state-appointed emergency financial manager to take over the city's operations.
Bing thanked the judge Wednesday for ruling quickly on the motion, and the mayor renewed his criticism of the city's top lawyer. The City Council earlier rejected Bing's request that it fire her.
Bing said the legal dispute has cost Detroit money in the form of higher interest rates for borrowing, as well as "further jeopardizing the city's revenue-sharing payments from the state."
Published: Fri, Jul 13, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone