––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted September 06, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Top Del. Court OKs record $300M attorney fee award
By Martha Neil
American Bar Association
In an en banc decision Monday, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld a record $300 million attorney fee award in a shareholder derivative suit.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which handled the appeal, argued that Chancellor Leo E. Strine Jr., who serves as chief judge of the state's highly regarded chancery court, abused his discretion by awarding an amount that pays the plaintiff's lawyers over $35,000 per hour, recounts the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.
However, the supreme court, in a 4-1 opinion (PDF) written by Justice Randy Holland, backed Strine's judgment. "The challenge of quantifying fee awards is entrusted to the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of capriciousness or factual findings that are clearly wrong," the opinion states.
The attorney fee award in the Southern Peru Copper Co. case reportedly is the largest amount ever approved in a shareholder derivative action. The case concerned a claimed sweetheart deal by the company's biggest shareholder to sell one of its own holdings to Southern Peru Copper in exchange for company stock that had risen significantly in value by the time the transaction concluded.
Strine said at a December hearing that corporate lawyers, like investment bankers, sometimes deserve a big payday, the newspaper reports.
''There's an idea that when a lawyer or law firms are going to get a big payment, that there's something somehow wrong about that, just because it's a lawyer. I'm sorry, but investment banks have hit it big, a lot of the bigger plaintiffs' lawyer firms have hit it big. They've hit it big many times,'' said Strine. ''And to me, envy is not an appropriate motivation to take into account when you set an attorney fee. It's not.''
A petition for a rehearing is unlikely, since the full court decided the appeal, but it's possible that an appeal will be made to the U.S. Supreme Court, the newspaper notes.
Law firms Prickett, Jones & Elliott of Wilmington, Del., and Pennsylvania-based Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check represented the plaintiffs in the case.
Published: Thu, Sep 6, 2012
headlines Ingham County
- MSU Law Moot Court team of two 3L students emerges national champions at First Amendment Competiton in D.C.
- MSU Law captivated by prominent Harvard professor analyzing artificial intelligence
- OWLS Meeting
- Advocate: Former insurance pro studies in Dual JD program
- Man with disabilities settles accessibility lawsuit
headlines National
- Nikole Nelson champions a national model to bring legal services to those without access
- Social media and your legal career
- OJ Simpson estate accepts $58M claim by father of Ron Goldman, killed along with Nicole Brown Simpson
- Law prof who called for military action and end to Israel sues over teaching suspension
- The advantages of using an AI agent in contract review
- Courthouse rock, political talk lead to potential suspension for Elvis-loving judge




