- Posted February 27, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Suburb wins appeal over Christmas display

WARREN (AP) -- A Detroit suburb did nothing illegal when it refused to allow a group to add an anti-religion message to a Christmas display at city hall, a federal appeals court said Monday.
The U.S. Constitution "does not convert these displays into a seasonal public forum, requiring governments to add all comers to the mix and creating a poison pill for even the most secular displays in the process," the court said in a 3-0 decision.
The Freedom From Religion Foundation, based in Madison, Wis., sued Warren in 2011 after Mayor Jim Fouts refused to remove a nativity scene and subsequently declined to add a provocative sign that took aim at people who celebrate Christmas as a Christian holiday.
"There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. ... Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds," the proposed "winter solstice" sign said.
Warren displays secular and religious symbols between Thanksgiving and Christmas, including a nativity scene, Santa Claus house, elves and a sleigh. Fouts told the group that the sign would cause hostility among visitors and city employees.
The appeals court said the holiday display is "government speech," but it's not illegal and doesn't mean an opposing view must have a spot.
If that were the case, "Veterans Day would lead to Pacifism Day, the Fourth of July to Non-Patriots Day, and so on," judges Jeffrey Sutton, David McKeague and Eugene Siler Jr. said.
Foundation co-president Annie Laurie Gaylor said the group will consider asking the full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to take another look at the case. Fouts, meanwhile, is pleased, saying the decision is a "victory for freedom of religion."
Published: Wed, Feb 27, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone