––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted March 06, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Firm plans free legal aid clinic in Southfield

The Law Offices of Hakim, Daman, & Toma PC plan to provide free legal assistance and consultation to the public in a special legal aid clinic on Sunday, March 17, from 11 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. at Mother of God Chaldean Catholic Church, 25585 Berg Road in Southfield.
"At Hakim Law we believe strongly in our community, we are involved, and we like to give back," said Amer Hakim, the firm's founder.
Hakim opened the firm's doors in 2004 to provide representation and consultation to clients across the legal field. He partnered with Fadi Toma and Eman Jajonie-Daman to form the new Law Offices of Hakim, Daman, & Toma PC and the three have broadened the scope of their practice to support client needs from immigration and criminal law to bankruptcy and business development.
Published: Wed, Mar 6, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case