- Posted September 19, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Dearborn judge's assets an issue in $1.2 million case

By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) -- A Dearborn judge was barred Tuesday from any unusual asset transfers while a former court employee tries to collect more than $1 million awarded after she claimed she was wrongly fired.
Judge Mark Somers had no objection to the order, and U.S. District Judge David Lawson described it as a "pretty routine" move. There was no suggestion that Somers was trying to keep assets out of the reach of Julie Pucci.
Somers has paid only $420 since a jury in 2011 ruled in favor of Pucci, who claimed her rights were violated when her job as deputy administrator in 19th District Court was eliminated and she wasn't promoted.
Pucci complained that Somers sent religious messages on court stationery and was proselytizing from the bench. Pucci was awarded about $1.2 million, including $420,000 in legal fees, although the figure continues to grow with interest.
It is still uncertain who's on the hook for the judgment: Somers or Dearborn taxpayers who finance the city's District Court. That dispute likely is headed to Wayne County Circuit Court.
Lawson said he has no jurisdiction over who pays the bill.
In June 2011, eight days before trial, Somers signed an order making the 19th District Court responsible for the cost of any verdict in the Pucci trial. He was the court's chief judge at the time.
"The timing ... ought to raise eyebrows," Lawson said recently.
In court Tuesday, Somers said he didn't know the opinion of the District Court's current chief judge, Sam Salamey. Lawson suggested they have a conversation.
Pucci, who is married to another judge at District Court, eventually got a new job with the city of Dearborn.
Published: Thu, Sep 19, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone