- Posted October 21, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Federal court says Bernanke doesn't have to testify now

By Marcy Gordon
AP Business Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A U.S. court has ruled that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke needn't answer questions in a lawsuit filed by the former head of American International Group Inc. until he leaves office in January.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit also ordered last Wednesday that ex-CEO Hank Greenberg's company would have to make a strong case that it needs to question Bernanke in order to do so after the Fed chairman's term ends. The company, Starr International, hasn't shown the "extraordinary circumstances" to justify it, a three-judge panel said.
The action reversed a July ruling in Greenberg's favor by a judge in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. It is rare for a Fed chairman to be deposed in a lawsuit while in office.
Greenberg sued the government over the $182 billion bailout of AIG during the financial crisis, saying the terms were too onerous. He is seeking at least $25 billion in damages. Starr International was the largest AIG shareholder.
AIG has since repaid the bailout.
Greenberg's lead attorney, David Boies, said his team will seek to question Bernanke after he leaves office. "We are confident that we can make the showing of the importance of this testimony that the court requires," Boies said in a statement.
Bernanke's public statements and testimony in the case from other government officials demonstrate that Bernanke's deposition is needed because he was a key decision maker in the AIG bailout, Boies said.
Published: Mon, Oct 21, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone