- Posted October 29, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Men who fought panhandling law each get $6,500 settlement

GRAND RAPIDS (AP) -- Two men who successfully fought the state's panhandling law after being arrested in Grand Rapids in 2011 for panhandling will each get $6,500 as part of a $48,000 settlement with the city.
The Grand Rapids Press reports the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented James Speet and Ernest Sims, gets the remaining $35,000 toward attorney fees.
In 2012, a federal judge in Michigan ruled that the law banning panhandling in public places violated First Amendment protections for free speech and the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. The decision was upheld by a federal appeals panel.
City attorney Catherine Mish confirmed terms of the recently approved settlement. She called it a difficult case. That's in part since the city had to defend a law it didn't put on the books.
Published: Tue, Oct 29, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone