––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted March 11, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Society to present debate on interpretation of the Constitution, March 27

Two constitutional law professors will face off Thursday, March 27, at Wayne State University Law School to debate "Originalism v. Living Constitutionalism."
Wayne State Distinguished Professor of Law Robert Sedler, a world-renowned expert on constitutional law, will represent the living constitutionalism point of view. He'll be challenged by University of Toledo College of Law Professor Lee J. Strang, a scholar of constitutional law and author of "Originalism and the Aristotelian Tradition: Virtue's Home in Originalism," which was published recently in Fordham Law Review.
The event, which is free and open to the public, will be sponsored by Wayne Law's Federalist Society from 12:15 to 1:15 p.m. in the Spencer M. Partrich Auditorium at the law school, 471 W. Palmer St. Lunch will be provided. Parking will be available for $6.50 in Structure One across West Palmer Street from the law school.
For additional information, contact Josh Hadley at joshua.hadley@wayne.edu.
Published: Tue, Mar 11, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone