––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted April 11, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Public administrative hearing to discuss the role of State Bar of Michigan
Pursuant to Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 1997-11(C) (page 51), the Task Force assigned to address the role of the State Bar of Michigan will hold a public hearing regarding its charge under Administrative Order No. 2014-5. The hearing will be held Friday, May 2, in the Supreme Court Courtroom, Sixth floor, Michigan Hall of Justice, 925 West Ottawa Street, Lansing.
The hearing will begin at 9:30 a.m. and will adjourn no later than 4:30 p.m., with a break from noon to 1 p.m. Each speaker on the agenda will be allotted 5 minutes, after which the Task Force members may ask questions. Agenda speakers will be the first 50 people who submit a request with the order of speakers at the discretion of the chair.
Requests to speak should be received no later than Monday, April 28, and either e-mailed to taskforceresbm@courts.mi.gov or mailed to The Task Force on the Role of the State Bar of Michigan, Nelson S. Leavitt, Reporter, Michigan Supreme Court, P. O. Box 30052, Lansing, 48909.
For those who cannot attend the hearing, comments will also be accepted in writing at the email and postal addresses above. Deadline for written comments is also April 28.
Administrative Order No. 2004-1 (page 70) pertains to State Bar of Michigan activities.
Published: Fri, Apr 11, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark