- Posted June 20, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Convict wins dispute over financing courthouse

LANSING (AP) - The Michigan Supreme Court says criminal defendants can't be billed for the costs of running the local courthouse.
The court unanimously ruled Wednesday in favor of an Allegan County convict who challenged a $1,000 penalty that accompanied his guilty plea in a drug case. The amount included $500 as his share of the court's operating costs.
The Supreme Court says judges can't order costs that aren't authorized by the Legislature. It overturned an appeals court decision that had upheld the practice used by Allegan and other counties.
Fred Cunningham's attorney is Anne Yantus, and she says the new ruling should greatly reduce the financial burdens on convicts who often have no ability to pay.
The Allegan County court collected $195,000 in 2013.
Published: Fri, Jun 20, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone