- Posted December 22, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Man wins big appeal in gun ownership case

HILLSDALE, Mich. (AP) - A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of a Michigan man who can't buy a gun because he was briefly treated for mental health problems after a divorce in the 1980s.
Clifford Tyler of Hillsdale says his constitutional right to bear arms is violated by a federal law that prohibits gun ownership if someone's been admitted to a mental hospital.
A Grand Rapids federal judge ruled in favor of the government. But the Cincinnati-based appeals court sent the case back last Thursday. The court says the law is unconstitutional as it applies to Tyler, unless the government shifts gears and argues that the 73-year-old is dangerous.
The government during oral argument last March said it had no evidence. Tyler has no criminal record.
The appeals court says the government's interest in keeping guns away from the mentally ill doesn't fit with depriving the Second Amendment rights of the "mentally healthy."
Tyler was deeply upset by a divorce in 1985. But he recovered, continued working for another two decades and remarried in 1999.
Published: Mon, Dec 22, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone