The Michigan Supreme Court has issued an order seeking public comment on proposed amendments to court rules that would codify existing statutory and caselaw requirements related to the issue of “Ability to Pay.” The amendments would require a court to make a finding about whether a defendant is able to comply with an order to pay without “manifest hardship,” would incorporate specific criteria to be considered by the court in making that finding, and would explicitly allow courts to impose alternative payment options. The suggested amendments were proposed by the Michigan State Planning Body for the Delivery of Legal Services to the Poor.
Bearden v Georgia, 461 US 660 (1983), established that incarcerating an individual for failure to pay without first determining whether the individual has the ability to pay fines, fees, and costs is a violation of the person’s constitutional rights. More recently, in response to Michigan judges asking for guidance on how and when to determine ability to pay, the State Court Administrative Office established an Ability to Pay workgroup made up of circuit and district judges, court administrators, indigent defense experts, and other stakeholders, which discussed ways to help courts address this issue.
The Ability to Pay workgroup report was published and distributed to courts and other interested parties early this year. The document included extensive resources for courts, including:
• Ability to Pay Checklists
• Statutory Requirements
• Court Rule Requirements
• Case Law Summary
• Ability to Pay Language
• Payment Plan Calculators
• Federal Poverty Guidelines Charts
• Means Test
• Payment Alternatives
• Incentives/Waivers
• Model Debt Inactivation Policy
The proposed amendments would supplement these other tools provided in the Ability to Pay workgroup report. Comments from the public on the proposed court rule amendments will help the Court decide whether the proposed changes should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected.
To comment, write to: ADMcomment@courts.mi.gov; or write to: Office of Administrative Counsel, PO Box 30052, Lansing, 48909. The deadline is March 1, 2016.
- Posted December 31, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Ability to Pay' amendments to court rules published for public comment

headlines Washtenaw County
- MSU Law captivated by prominent Harvard professor analyzing artificial intelligence
- MSU Law Moot Court team of two 3L students emerges national champions at First Amendment Competiton in D.C.
- Former insurance pro studies in Dual JD program
- Levin Center unveils 'Learning by Hearings' classroom resources
- OWLS Meeting
headlines National
- Immunity doesn’t protect Trump from $83.3M defamation verdict over sexual assault denials, 2nd Circuit rules
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Disconnect from facts may explain public’s outrage around Bryan Kohberger plea deal
- Kavanaugh cites precedent, ‘common sense’ in supporting SCOTUS order allowing immigration stops
- Donna Adelson was ‘matriarch mastermind’ in law prof’s murder, but others could be charged, jury foreperson speculates
- Domestic abuse survivor who was inspiration for new reduced-sentencing law loses bid for release