The Michigan appeals court, however, ruled against them, saying the women have no rights under state law because they’re not the biological mothers and the children weren’t born during a marriage. In brief orders, the Supreme Court, 5-2, declined to take appeals.
Mabry was in a same-sex relationship for 15 years. Her partner gave birth to three children between 2001 and 2008 and even took Mabry’s last name. But they ended the relationship, and Mabry has been prohibited from seeing the children.
Justice Bridget McCormack said the case deserves the Supreme Court’s attention.
“As with all child custody disputes, the child’s best interests are paramount, and trial courts regularly engage in fact-finding to determine how those interests
should be served,” said McCormack, who was joined in her dissent by Justice Richard Bernstein.
“I believe Michigan’s trial courts are capable of evaluating the parties’ relationship to determine whether the parties would have married but for Michigan’s unconstitutional prohibition of same-sex marriage,” McCormack wrote.
She predicted there would be only a small number of similar cases.
Kolailat was in a same-sex relationship for nine years. Like Mabry, she said she’s been cut off from a child who was born to her partner during that time.
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available