- Posted October 14, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Fed saw no-hike decision in September as a 'close call'
By Martin Crutsinger
AP Economics Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal Reserve officials last month kept a key interest rate unchanged but saw the decision as a "close call." Many believed that the case for a rate hike had strengthened in recent months.
Minutes of the Sept. 20-21 meeting released Wednesday showed Fed officials were inching closer to hiking rates for the first time since last December. But they decided to hold off, given that inflation was still running below their 2 percent target and there was little sign of rising wage pressures.
The minutes said that some officials believed it would be appropriate to raise rates "relatively soon" if the labor market kept improving.
Analysts said they believed the minutes provided further evidence that the Fed will keep rates unchanged at the next meeting in November but will be ready to raise rates in December.
"The meeting minutes make plain that the case for a rate hike was a close call and it looks like the only way (Federal Reserve Chair Janet) Yellen could hold down the get-going voices of the hawks was to promise them a rate hike later this year," said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Union Bank in New York. "At this point there would have to be some very weak economic data for the Fed not to raise rates in December."
The minutes, released after the customary three-week lag, covered the Fed's Sept. 20-21 meeting. After that meeting, the Fed announced that it was keeping its key interest unchanged but sent a strong signal that it could raise rates before year's end.
The September decision was approved on a 7-3 vote with a rare three dissents. Three presidents of Federal Reserve regional banks - Esther George of Kansas City, Loretta Mester of Cleveland and Eric Rosengren of Boston - all dissented. All wanted the Fed to raise rates at the September meeting.
The deep divisions were evident in the minutes, which said that the officials pushing for an immediate rate hike were concerned that further delay risked eroding the Fed's credibility, "given that recent economic data had largely corroborated the committee's economic outlook."
But the majority of Fed officials argued for delay, contending that inflation was still very low and three was still room for the unemployment rate to fall further without triggering high inflation.
"Some participants believed that it would be approprriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate relatively soon if the labor market continued to improve and economic activity strengthened, while some others preferred to wait for more convincing evidence that inflation was moving towards the committee's 2 percent objective," the minutes said.
Last week, the government reported that employers added 156,000 jobs in September, fewer than the 167,000 in August and well below last year's monthly average of 230,000.
Analysts believe that the central bank will wait until its last meeting of the year in December before raising rates. The Fed's next meeting is Nov. 1-2. But it's not expected to make a move then, given that it will be just a week before the presidential election.
In December last year, the Fed hiked its benchmark lending rate after leaving it at a record low near zero since December 2008.
It indicated at the time that it might raise rates another four times in 2016. But since then, turbulence in financial markets, concerns about China and an unexpected vote by Britain in June to leave the European Union have prompted the Fed to delay further rate hikes.
Published: Fri, Oct 14, 2016
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark