American Bar Association President Linda A. Klein sent letters to the leaders of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee urging them to reject any proposals that would require law firms and other personal service businesses to switch from the simple cash method of accounting to the more complex and costly accrual method.
The ABA expressed concerns that, if enacted, the proposals would cause substantial financial hardship to many lawyers, law firms and other personal service businesses by forcing them to pay tax up front on “phantom” income they have not received and may never receive.
Although the ABA commends Congress for its efforts to craft legislation aimed at simplifying the tax laws, the ABA opposes proposals that would require many personal services businesses including law firms to use the accrual method of accounting rather than the traditional cash receipts and disbursement method.
The ABA cautioned that these mandatory accrual accounting would create unnecessary complexity in the tax law, increase compliance costs and kill jobs, and impede economic growth by discouraging law firms and other professional service providers from expanding or merging with other providers because it could trigger the costly accrual accounting requirement. These mandatory accrual accounting proposals are also strongly opposed by more than 30 state and local bars throughout the country.
- Posted April 26, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
ABA supports law firms' use of cash accounting

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone