Oakland County will appeal a ruling by the Michigan Court of Claims that granted the defendant’s motion for summary disposition and denied the county’s motion for summary disposition in its lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of both the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission (MIDC) Act and the MIDC’s approved standards. In its appeal, the county will contend that the Court of Claims erred in its interpretation of the MIDC Act and the Michigan Constitution.
Oakland County filed its original complaint against the State of Michigan, the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), and the MIDC in the Michigan Court of Claims last July. The complaint also alleged that the MIDC created its rules and procedures in violation of Michigan’s Administrative Procedures Act.
“We agree that individuals charged with a crime in Michigan have a constitutional right to legal representation even if they cannot afford a lawyer. There are egregious errors, however, in the MIDC Act and standards established by the MIDC and LARA that higher courts must address,” Lerminiaux said.
Oakland County expects to file its appeal to the Michigan Court of Appeals before Thanksgiving.
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available