After 40 years in the Kerrytown neighborhood in downtown Ann Arbor, Legal Services of South Central Michigan (LSSCM), has moved to 15 S. Washington in the historic Smith Furniture building in downtown Ypsilanti. Michigan Advocacy Program and Michigan Legal Help Program also made the move in July. Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, Family Law Project, and Michigan Poverty Law Program will join them in the new building by year end. Pictured in front of the new location are (left to right) Diana Marin, FLS attorney; Libby Benton, LSSCM attorney; Sarah Munro, LSSCM attorney; Tonya Correll, LSSCM legal assistant; Zach Levi, LSSCM legal assistant; Ann Routt, MAP co-director; Lisa Maskill, LSSCM attorney; Tish Lee, LSSCM managing attorney; Ciara McGrane, LSSCM post-graduate fellow; Daina Robinson, LSSCM law clerk; Alex Page, LSSCM law clerk; Pablo Nuñez, FLS intern; Kathryn Haroney, LSSCM legal assistant; and Alan Baldridge, LSSCM law clerk. For additional information on these programs, visit miadvocacy.org.
– Photo courtesy of Michigan Advocacy Program
- Posted August 30, 2018
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Several legal services now under one roof

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case