Varnum attorney Chris Ballard was recently named Chair-Elect of the Probate and Estate Planning Section of the State Bar of Michigan.
Ballard, who works in the firm’s Ann Arbor office, focuses his practice on estate planning, trust administration, business planning, taxation and nonprofit organizations. He frequently counsels clients on fiduciary, international and partnership tax matters.
Ballard has been active in the SBM Probate and Estate Planning Section for many years, including serving as organizer/director of this year’s ICLE Probate Institute. The institute is traditionally the largest CLE course in the state, drawing almost 700 attendees this year.
Ballard is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and has an AV Preeminent rating – the highest possible – from Martindale Hubbell. Best Lawyers recently named him Ann Arbor Lawyer of the Year: Trusts and Estates, and Super Lawyers has named him to the Top 50 Michigan Consumer Lawyers.
In addition to his professional activity, Ballard is active in the community serving as a legal officer for the Civil Air Patrol and on the Board of Directors for FIRST Michigan.
- Posted October 18, 2018
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Ballard elected to leadership role for SBM Probate and Estate Planning Section
headlines Washtenaw County
- MSU Law captivated by prominent Harvard professor analyzing artificial intelligence
- MSU Law Moot Court team of two 3L students emerges national champions at First Amendment Competiton in D.C.
- Former insurance pro studies in Dual JD program
- Levin Center unveils 'Learning by Hearings' classroom resources
- OWLS Meeting
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




