By Tom Kirvan
Legal News
For young lawyers intent on cutting their teeth in courtroom work, the traditional career path is to snag a job as an assistant prosecutor as a steppingstone to life in private practice.
Attorney Jay Brant followed a different road to legal success over an illustrious career spanning more than four decades.
Brant, who died June 25 in East Lansing at age 82, began making a legal name for himself as a litigator with Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn, one of Detroit’s premier law firms. There he caught the eye of Jim Robinson, already heralded as a rising star at Honigman.
Robinson was destined, however, to make his mark in public service, becoming U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan in 1977 at the age of 33. Despite his impressive credentials, Robinson was a surprise choice for the plum job since he had never practiced criminal law.
“But he had a great reputation as a hard-working civil litigator and as an adjunct professor at Wayne State University Law School, teaching evidence law,” said Bill Richards, a retired district court judge in Oakland County who early in his career worked for Robinson in the U.S. Attorney’s Office. “Nowhere were Jim’s high standards of professionalism more evident than in his hiring of fabulous people to join our staff. One of those was Jay Brant.”
A Wayne Law grad, Brant had a mind for complex legal matters, a talent he may have developed while earning his bachelor’s degree from Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburgh. It was honed further during a stint as special counsel to Detroit City Council before he joined Honigman.
His eventual move from a “silk stocking law firm” to the land of public service was an “extraordinary development,” according to Richards.
“We were lucky if we could get somebody to join our staff after a short clerkship with a federal judge,” said Richards, a University of Michigan Law School alum. “But then we would frequently lose those people after a few years to law firms which could pay far more than the government could.
“So for Jim to reverse that trend and bring in an accomplished lawyer like Jay from a top law firm was a startling change.”
Brant quickly became part of Robinson’s “hand-picked administrative ‘SWAT team of Big Dogs,’” according to Mark Werder, who was beginning his legal career as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Detroit at the time Brant was hired. Robinson’s trusted triumvirate included Rich Rossman as his chief assistant, Lenny Gilman as head of the Criminal Division, and Brant as chief of the Civil Division.
“Robinson’s selection of Jay for Chief of Civil was like Zorro selecting a particular kind of swordfighter,” Werder said. “I was in the Criminal Division at first so Jay didn’t supervise me, but I very quickly became aware of his high reputation within the office and at the Department of Justice as a brilliant young lawyer. He was not an armchair supervisor and had a docket of mega major cases he handled personally – the Wurtsmith Air Force Base contamination case, the Detroit Water and Sewer Department receivership – highly prominent, super-hot potato cases that would last over a decade.
“His insight into civil litigation, especially complex environmental cases, was comprehensive and highly technical at a time when environmental law was becoming the next big thing,” Werder added. “He was one of those lawyers that seemed to have an engineering background of some kind with finely honed analytical instincts . . . if he thought there ‘might be” an issue about something, there was definitely an issue.”
Brant later ran the Appellate Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, displaying yet another impressive skill set, Werder indicated.
“All briefs filed at that level needed Jay’s review and blessing, and he was a scholar and very strong critical thinker and writer,” said Werder. “Virtually nothing went across his desk that was ‘good enough as written.’ Jay was a diplomat as a lawyer, very soft spoken, unflappable in court, and an advocate well known to and trusted by the state and federal bench.”
Those remarks were echoed by Judge Richards, who was among those line attorneys who had his work critiqued by Brant.
“Once we discovered Jay’s immense talent, we did not resent his new role or the extra time it took to get your draft brief to Jay in time for him to review it and get it back to you with suggested edits,” said Richards.
“Jay was as sweet and gentle a man as I have ever met,” Richards added. “He was incredibly soft spoken. He had a gentle wit. I never once heard him raise his voice. ........What a guy.”
Brant’s wife for the past 11 years, Lynn Richardson first crossed paths with him in the early 1980s when clerking for U.S. District Judge John Feikens. But it would take another 20 years before they became reacquainted.
When they met for a second time, Richardson was living in East Lansing and was a commissioner of the Michigan Supreme Court, providing analysis of cases for justices to review.
“I worried that he would not be happy in this little college town, or in my ‘old-fashioned’ neighborhood,” said Richardson. “My fears were completely unfounded. Jay quickly met one of our neighbors, Don Power, and together they, along with two or three other retirees, became familiar faces at City Council meetings. Jay’s thorough research and preparation, as well as his calm demeanor and presentation, were respected, especially when many in the gallery were emotionally involved. Jay was asked to serve on the city’s Housing Commission, in large part because of the skills that he demonstrated to City Council.”
His love for politics dovetailed with his passion for civil rights and equal justice for all.
“It was one of his core values,” said Richardson.
“He proudly carried his ACLU card in his wallet, and he supported the Southern Poverty Law Center’s activities. Jay became active in the Protect the Vote projects in Michigan, and in 2008 and 2012, he was an election monitor in Saginaw and Detroit. He truly believed that voting was the way to make your voice heard and to effect change.”
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/subscriptions
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
