Livonia, MI – The 104-year old Citizens Research Council of Michigan announced the 2020 Virtual Public Policy Event to be held 6 to 7:30 p.m. on Oct. 22.
Former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, Barbara L. McQuade will share her perspective on how police reforms in Detroit addressed issues still confronting other major cities.
There will also be a panel discussion on “Public Health in Michigan during COVID-19,” moderated by Citizens Research Council health policy research associate Timothy Michling.
Panelists will include: Marianne Udow-Phillips, Center for Health and Research Transformation; Phyllis Meadows, Senior Fellow in the Health Program at The Kresge Foundation; and Representative Hank Vaupel, chair of the House Health Policy Committee of the Michigan House of Representatives.
Sponsorships are available, and individuals may register at $20 per person. All donations are tax deductible.
To register visit crcmich.org/event, or call 734-542-8001. Sign-in details will be provided before the event.
- Posted October 08, 2020
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Citizens Research Council Oct. 22 virtual event will discuss police reform and public health

headlines Ingham County
- MSU Law Moot Court team of two 3L students emerges national champions at First Amendment Competiton in D.C.
- MSU Law captivated by prominent Harvard professor analyzing artificial intelligence
- OWLS Meeting
- Advocate: Former insurance pro studies in Dual JD program
- Man with disabilities settles accessibility lawsuit
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case