Clark will will present a webinar on “Restrictive Covenants: Best Practices for In-House Counsel and HR Professionals in a Changing Legal Environment” on Wednesday, May 12, beginning at noon via Zoom.
New legislative and judicial initiatives are changing how non-competes and other restrictive covenants are being enforced.
This program will discuss how in-house counsel and HR professionals are evolving to avoid new pitfalls that arise when newly hired employees bring pre-existing restrictive covenants with them. The webinar will also examine that when employees with restrictive covenants depart, corporate attorneys and HR executives can utilize new best practices to maximize enforcement of their non-competes.
In addition, the speakers will look at whether indemnity agreements, reps and warranties, sign-on bonuses and deferred compensation and other practical strategies will affect the enforcement of non-competes in today’s new legal environment. Speaking at the program will be Clark Hill’s Paul Starkman and Sam Tallman.
To register for the webinar, visit www.clarkhill.com/events.
- Posted May 04, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Restrictive Covenants' focus of law firm's webinar

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case