SANFORD, Mich. (AP) — Property owners near dams that failed in the Midland area won a key decision in lawsuits against the state.
Judge Cynthia Stephens said the lawsuits can go forward, rejecting a request to dismiss by the Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy. It’s an early stage in the litigation, but the ruling kast Friday was a victory for people who claim the state contributed to the disaster.
“This is a significant step forward in compensating these nearly 10,000 flood victims,” attorney Ven Johnson said.
A year ago, the Edenville Dam failed during a steady rain, draining Wixom Lake and unleashing the Tittabawassee River, which then overwhelmed the Sanford Dam.
Johnson said the state failed to demand repairs at the privately owned Edenville Dam, after federal regulators revoked the hydroelectric permit in 2018, and emphasized a high lake level to protect aquatic life.
The lawsuits allege an unconstitutional taking of private property without compensation.
Property owners have “adequately alleged a causal connection between the government’s actions and the alleged damages,” said Stephens, a judge at the Court of Claims.
She said the arguments were similar to those made by Flint residents whose water was spoiled by lead. The Michigan Supreme Court in 2020 said residents could make an inverse condemnation claim against the state, which allowed use of the Flint River.
- Posted May 25, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Property owners near failed dams win key court ruling

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone