The American Bar Association will present the online program “Remote Jury Trials During and After (?) the Pandemic: Constitutional and Practical Concerns (Part Two)” on Thursday, June 3, beginning at 1 p.m.
Part One of this program looked at constitutional concerns arising out of remote jury trials. Part Two of this program will consider practical ones involving the participants in remote jury trials, how to secure community participation, and what the post-pandemic jury system might be. Among the speakers will be Oakland County 46th District Court Judge Debra Nance.
The faculty of this program will:
• Examine the roles and concerns of “participants” in remote trials – prosecution and defense, plaintiffs and defendants, and judge
• Describe how disadvantaged populations might participate in remote trials as jurors, witnesses, or observers and how the public right of access might be accommodated
• Discuss how to deal with recalcitrant in-person jurors or witnesses and reach out to communities that might have limited or no access to necessary technology
• Consider what might be the “new normal” after the pandemic for criminal and civil trials
Cost for the online program is $40 for ABA members and $75 for non-members. To register, visit www.americanbar.org and click on “events.”
- Posted May 25, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Online program on remote jury trials offered by ABA

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone