By Nicole Black
BridgeTower Media Newswires
DETROIT, MI—If I’ve said it once, I’ll say it again: Think before you post.
This recommendation applies to everyone, of course. But if you’re a lawyer, then you’d best heed my advice and tread lightly when posting commentary online on social media sites or elsewhere. Otherwise you run the risk of running afoul of your ethical obligations and unleashing the wrath of your bar’s disciplinary body. At the very least, you’ll face embarrassment and at the worst you may be disciplined or even barred from the practice of law altogether.
If you’re not yet convinced, then maybe the results of a recent South Carolina disciplinary action will do the trick. In the Matter of David Paul Traywick, Opinion No. 28037, which was filed in June 2021, an attorney faced the music for his online behavior to the tune of a six-month suspension.
At issue in this opinion were 12 different postings made on Facebook by the attorney in question. Notably, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct received a significant number of complaints about his actions: “Beginning in June 2020, ODC received complaints from forty-six separate individuals regarding statements Respondent made on his Facebook page. At that time, Respondent maintained a personal Facebook account with a privacy setting of ‘public,’ meaning his posts were visible to anyone, not just his Facebook ‘friends,’ and even if the person did not have a Facebook account. In his Facebook profile, Respondent identified himself as a lawyer and referenced his law firm.”
In its opinion, the commission focused on two particularly inflammatory statements, both of which were “not expressive; they (we)re expressly incendiary ... and had the effect of inciting gender and race-based conflict beyond the scope of the conversation ... (and the) fact Respondent is a lawyer exacerbated this effect.”
One of the statements was about tattoos and his extreme dislike for both tattoos and people with tattoos, particularly “these females.” The other related to the murder of George Floyd, wherein he insinuated — by using very derogatory language — that Mr. Floyd’s life didn’t matter and, as proof of that fact, he noted that the stock markets went up in the days after his murder.
The commission explained that both statements were quite troubling, and that the posting regarding Mr. Floyd was of particular concern since it “was intended to incite intensified racial conflict not only in Respondent’s Facebook community, but also in the broader community of Charleston and beyond. We hold this statement in particular tended to bring the legal profession into disrepute, violated the letter and spirit of the Lawyer’s Oath, and constitutes grounds for discipline under Rules 7(a)(5) and 7(a)(6), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.”
For that reason, the commission found that because of the attorney’s actions and the extremely inflammatory nature of his postings, he should be suspended from the practice of law for six months and would also be required to complete “at least one hour of diversity education ... a comprehensive anger management assessment ... (and) undergo an evaluation through the Lawyers Helping Lawyers program ....”
In other words, they determined that those postings were strong evidence that he had a multitude of issues that needed to be addressed.
So dear readers, don’t be like David. When you’re interacting online and find yourself particularly upset about a random issue and decide that you’d like to share your ire with friends near and far, please take a deep breath. Then take another one, and then one more. Finally, ask yourself if it’s absolutely imperative that you share your frustration with the world. The answer is almost certainly “no.”
But if for some reason you should determine that the answer is “yes” and your opinion relates to a particularly divisive topic, perhaps consider asking your life partner, or even one of your kids, for their opinion as to whether you should post it. Then maybe ask your goldfish or your cat.
By the time you’ve solicited these opinions, you’ll likely have calmed down a bit, and probably won’t care as much about the issue as you did 10 minutes earlier. In which case, don’t post about it. Put your keyboard down, shut your laptop and slowly step away from your desk. Go watch a movie or read a book. Maybe even take a walk.
Whatever you do, don’t post that rant online. Trust me; it’s for the best.
————————
Nicole Black is a Rochester, New York attorney, author, journalist, and the Legal Technology Evangelist at MyCase legal practice management software.
- Posted August 24, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
COMMENTARY: Think before you post to social media
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark