- Posted January 04, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Programs offered for family division referees, Jan. 26-27

The Michigan Judicial Institute (MJI) is pleased to offer two upcoming webinars specifically designed for family division referees.
The "Family Division Referees Webinar: Juvenile Division" will take place Wednesday, January 26, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. via Zoom.
Presentations will include:
- Statutory, Court Rule, Caselaw/SCAO Update
- Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: What Jurists Need to Know
- Updated Perspective on Youth Marijuana Use
- Medication Assisted Treatment and Child Welfare
The "Family Division Referees Webinar: Domestic Relations Division" will take place Thursday, January 27, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. via Zoom.
Presentations will include:
- Statutory, Court Rule, Caselaw Update
- Crafting Orders in Domestic Violence Cases
- Child Support Issues
- Medication Assisted Treatment and Parenting Time
To register for either webinar, visit https://mjieducation.mi.gov and click on "events." Once registration is approved by MJI, attendees will receive a confirmation e-mail from Zoom with a personal link to join the webinar.
Published: Tue, Jan 04, 2022
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case