The State Bar of Michigan Debtor-Creditor Rights Committee and the Bankruptcy Committee of the Federal Bar Association, Eastern District of Michigan Chapter, will present a webinar on “The New Michigan Uniform Assignment of Rents Act” Tuesday, August 23, from noon to 1:30 p.m. via Zoom.
The Michigan Uniform Assignment of Rents Act (“MUARA”) was signed into law by Governor Gretchen Whitmer on June 24, 2022. The MUARA becomes effective on September 22, 2022. The MUARA dramatically changes the law governing assignments of rents in Michigan. This free Zoom webinar will review the MUARA and will include a practical discussion of the impact of the legislation.
Presenters will include:
• U.S. Bankruptcy Court Chief Judge Daniel Opperman, Eastern District of Michigan
• James L. Allen
• Robert N. Bassel
• Paul R. Hage, Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer, & Weiss PC
• Michael S. Leib, Leib ADR LLC)
To register for the free webinar, visit https://fbamich.org and click on “events.”
Anyone with questions may email Judith Greenstone Miller at jmiller@jaffelaw.com.
- Posted July 26, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
New Michigan Uniform Assignment of Rents Act examined in webinar

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case