In December 2022, the State of Michigan, the United States and four Tribal governments – the Bay Mills Indian Community, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians – filed a proposed Great Lakes Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
The proposed agreement comes after three years of negotiations. It would extend for 24 years the system of overseeing commercial and sport fishing in parts of lakes Huron, Michigan and Superior.
Because not all governments involved in the negotiations concurred with the proposed decree, it is not yet in effect; rather, it is on a litigation track that will extend into the spring. Because all parties were bound by a confidentiality agreement, the contents of the document could not be discussed prior to its release last month.
As expected, some questions have arisen in relation to the proposed decree’s potential impact on the Great Lakes fishery within the 1836 Treaty area. To clear up any confusion and clarify key points, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources has compiled a list of the most frequently asked questions.
The proposed decree and FAQ are available at the DNR’s consent decree webpage at https://bit.ly/408Fmku.
- Posted February 01, 2023
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
DNR shares FAQs about proposed Great Lakes Consent Decree, now awaiting federal review

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Judge accused of using ‘game or jail’ tactic, asserting abuse victims get ‘Super Bowl’ neurochemicals
- Prosecutor gets suspension for invading jury’s ‘inner sanctum’
- Lateral hiring bounced back in 2024, especially for associates in BigLaw, new NALP report says
- Refugee ban can’t be enforced against those who received conditional approval, 9th Circuit says
- ABA, more than 50 bar associations condemn ‘government actions that seek to twist the scales of justice’