Nominating petitions for the 2023 State Bar of Michigan election will be available in the Michigan Bar Journal and posted on the State Bar website this month. The June election will include:
• A non-judicial member of the Judicial Tenure Commission
• Representative Assembly members in 38 judicial circuits
• Board of Commissioner seats in four districts
• Members of the Young Lawyers Section Executive Council in three districts
Candidates must submit nominating petitions to the State Bar of Michigan between Saturday, April 1, and Sunday, April 30. Completed petitions should be sent via email to Carrie Sharlow at csharlow@michbar.org.
All active members of the State Bar will receive their ballots via email by June 1 and ballots must be cast online by 11:59 p.m. June 15. To ensure members receive a ballot and notifications about the election, members should make sure their current email address is on file at e.michbar.org.
Anyone with questions may contact Marge Bossenbery at mbossenbery@michbar.org or Carrie Sharlow at csharlow@michbar.org.
- Posted March 14, 2023
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State Bar of Michigan gearing up for June election

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case