The National Center for State Courts’ Family-Centered Justice will present a webinar on “Comprehensive Screening” Friday, August 25, from 1 to 2 p.m. via Zoom.
The purpose of Family-Centered Justice at NCSC is to cultivate courts that center on families and help build strong communities where all families thrive.
In this webinar, NCSC’s Nora Sydow will moderate a panel discussion with Joe DiTunno, deputy director of Family Services at the Connecticut Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division; Tricia Lucido, director of Probation Services at Montgomery County Juvenile Courts; and Tara Kunkel, executive director of Rulo Strategies.
These comprehensive screening experts will discuss universal behavioral health screening for youth, social determinants of health screening, and family triage screening. They will discuss how their screeners are used and the outcomes they have shown and engage attendees in a Q&A session.
To register for the “Comprehensive Screening” webinar, visit www.ncsc.org and click on “webinars.”
- Posted August 18, 2023
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Comprehensive Screening' explored by NCSC's Family-Centered Justice

headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case