––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted February 05, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Prosecutor can't be sued over 2003 terrorism trial

DETROIT (AP) -- A man whose 2003 conviction on terror-related charges in Detroit was thrown out can't sue the prosecutor for misconduct.
A federal appeals court reversed a lower court Wednesday and ruled in favor of Richard Convertino.
Karim Koubriti was seeking millions from Convertino, claiming his constitutional rights were violated. Koubriti's terror conviction was overturned in 2004 after the government said evidence was withheld from the defense.
The appeals court says Convertino can't be sued because he has immunity as a prosecutor. Koubriti still has claims pending against an FBI agent.
Koubriti's lawyer, Ben Gonek, says he's disappointed. A message seeking comment was left with Convertino's attorney. Convertino is no longer a federal prosecutor.
Published: Fri, Feb 5, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case