––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted February 16, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Wayne law review marks 100 years of border treaty

DETROIT (AP) -- The Boundary Waters Treaty that has governed relations between the U.S. and Canada for a century is the focus of a special edition of the law review at Wayne State University.
The Wayne Law Review special issue is an outgrowth of a 2009 symposium at the Detroit school and is free online.
The Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 created the International Joint Commission, an independent body to avoid or solve boundary water disputes between Canada and the U.S.
The commission considers applications for projects such as dams and regulates many such projects. It also has duties under the 1972 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement to oversee environmental issues.
------------------
On the Net:
Wayne Law Review special edition: http://j.mp/cppuPs
Published: Tue, Feb 16, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case