––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted July 21, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
News (AP) - Appeals court tosses out Detroit woman's sentence

PORT HURON (AP) -- A four-year prison sentence has been tossed out after a federal judge in Port Huron stated the wrong facts and had a written decision in hand before the hearing.
An appeals court ruled Monday in the case of Lashawn Wilson of Detroit, who used stolen money orders to buy computers.
Wilson was sentenced to 48 months in prison, well above the guideline, after federal Judge Lawrence Zatkoff said she stole money orders and cashier's checks from a bank. Someone else actually took them.
Zatkoff also had a sentence already on paper. The judge asked lawyers to read it and raise any objections.
Two members of the appeals panel say it's not illegal but "should not be tolerated" because it leaves the perception that a defendant didn't get a fair shake.
Published: Wed, Jul 21, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case