––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 02, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Detroit voters won't get vote on schools oversight

DETROIT (AP) § The Detroit City Council has decided against letting voters express their opinions on how the city's struggling schools should be governed.
The council voted 6-3 last Thursday against putting the question of mayoral control on the November ballot.
Detroit Mayor Dave Bing says voters have been denied the chance to decide what system works for their children. U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan was among those urging control of the district go to the mayor.
The plan would have asked the public if it favors continuing to have an elected school board in charge of the Detroit Public Schools. Gov. Jennifer Granholm has put emergency financial manager Robert Bobb over the district.
Granholm says voters were denied the chance to help move their schools forward.
Published: Mon, Aug 2, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case