––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 20, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
News (AP) - Imprisoned consultant ordered to surrender watch

DETROIT (AP) -- A judge says Detroit political consultant Sam Riddle must surrender a $5,500 designer watch he got as part of a bribe from a Southfield jeweler.
U.S. District Judge Marianne Battani issued a forfeiture order Wednesday for the watch.
The order says Riddle agreed to turn over the Breitling watch as part of his plea to conspiracy. He admitted roles in bribery and extortion schemes with then-Southfield Councilman William councilman and then-Detroit Councilwoman Monica Conyers.
Authorities say Riddle conspired to give Lattimore $12,500 to help the jewelry store relocate to the Detroit suburb.
Riddle is now in federal prison at his own request. He declined bond to begin serving time credited against an expected sentence of up to 37 months.
Published: Fri, Aug 20, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case