––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted October 25, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Robo-signed' affidavits filed in foreclosure cases across the country: Fraud or shoddy paperwork?
By Ben Mook
The Daily Record Newswire
As prosecutors and class-action attorneys grapple with the extent to which "robo-signed" affidavits were filed in foreclosure cases across the country, the nation's judiciary will have to decide whether to handle them merely as instances of shoddy paperwork -- or as frauds perpetrated on the court.
Courts, state financial regulators and attorneys general in every state and the District of Columbia are looking into whether employees at banks and foreclosure processing firms signed court documents that had unverified or false information in an attempt to speed up the process.
But, it is uncertain what the impact and response from the country's judiciary will be.
"If you're in the process of litigating a case right now, it certainly could be a big deal," Greg Hurly, an analyst with the National Center for State Courts, in Williamsburg, Va., said. "But, it's hard to say what the course of action will be. It's not something the courts saw coming down the pike."
All of the nation's state attorneys general and 40 states' banking regulators banded together recently to open an investigation into how widespread the robo-signing issue is.
The banks being looked at have said the information in the affidavits is accurate and that it is a procedural mistake as opposed to fraud.
"I think it is somewhere between a glitch and fraud," said Kendall Coffey, a former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida who is now in private practice in Miami.
"It is more than a paperwork glitch, but the standard for what a court would consider to be fraud is high. Without a factual discrepancy, many courts probably wouldn't see it as a fraud on the court."
But Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray is convinced at least one lender has acted fraudulently.
He filed a lawsuit against GMAC Mortgage this month seeking $25,000 for each inaccurate file, claiming the bank was committing fraud under the state's Consumer Sales Practices Act.
"In this country, the courts have derived very specific rules for dealing with the process of removing someone from their home," Cordray said.
"Frankly, these financial institutions don't seem to think they have to play by the same rules. I think it's fraud, and it's indefensible."
Bank of America said this month it was halting foreclosures and foreclosure sales nationwide. And recently, JPMorganChase and GMAC, which had already halted foreclosures in 23 states, agreed to expand their review of documents to all 50 states.
But the banks are still only halting foreclosures in the original 23 states. Wells Fargo and Co. and PNC have said they would not halt foreclosures but would review documents.
Bank of America, JPMorganChase and GMAC are the three institutions being targeted initially by the attorneys general investigation.
Whether courts find evidence of fraud, many agree that the instances of robo-signing have dealt a blow to the integrity of the judiciary system.
Patrick B. Bauer, a professor at the University of Iowa College of Law, said the wide scale filing of false affidavits is sure to have major repercussions.
"If people don't tell the truth, especially in these court filings, it can really undermine the integrity of the whole system," Bauer said.
"It is a question of accuracy, or correctness, in a matter as consequential as someone possibly losing their home."
In states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida, where courts hear foreclosure cases, the person signs an affidavit swearing under oath that all of the contents had been reviewed and are accurate.
With the robo-signing scandal, the accusations are that the affidavits were signed with little attention, if any, paid to the contents, or were signed by others.
"Effectively the affidavit, in judicial review states, is the equivalent of eyewitness testimony and, with robo-signing; it's tantamount to having an imposter witness," Coffey said.
"It is very much an integrity issue and integrity is indispensable to the process."
Published: Mon, Oct 25, 2010
headlines Jackson County
headlines National
- Lucy Lang, NY inspector general, has always wanted rules evenly applied
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- 2024 Year in Review: Integrated legal AI and more effective case management
- How to ensure your legal team is well-prepared for the shifting privacy landscape
- Judge denies bid by former Duane Morris partner to stop his wife’s funeral
- Attorney discipline records short of disbarment would be expunged after 8 years under state bar plan