––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted December 03, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Suit over court-appointed lawyers gets new life
LANSING (AP) -- The Michigan Supreme Court has reversed itself again and reinstated a lawsuit that challenges the system of appointing lawyers for criminal defendants who can't afford them.
The key difference is Justice Alton Davis, who was appointed to the court in August but soon will leave after losing the recent election. He was part of the 4-3 majority Wednesday.
The lawsuit claims that the rights of poor people have been violated because the paltry pay given to court-appointed lawyers routinely forces defendants into plea bargains.
The Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit in July without considering the merits of the allegations. That was three months after it had unanimously sent the case back to the trial judge for more work on whether it should be granted class-action status.
Published: Fri, Dec 3, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Could Trump’s judicial appointments slow in the new year?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Practical guidance for ethically changing law firms
- ‘Christmas Lawyer’ uses settlement with homeowners association on more holiday decorations
- DOJ sues state officials over laws protecting immigrants at courthouses
- Building the case for trial in the last 60 days




