––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted December 14, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Congress exempts lawyers from FTC's Red Flags Rules

Michigan lawyers will recall the so-called "Red Flags Rules," promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission as part of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 and intended to combat identity theft. The rules, first scheduled to take effect May 1, 2009, but delayed many times since then, require "creditors" and "financial institutions" to develop and implement written programs to identify, detect, and respond to the warning signs (red flags) of identity theft. Lawyers and other professionals were dragged into the fray when the FTC belatedly determined they were creditors under the Act. The rules imposed potentially onerous and time consuming record requirements for lawyers that seemingly provide little benefit to most clients but would increase the cost of law office administration and legal services.
The State Bar of Michigan joined the ABA and others in seeking to convince the FTC the rules should not apply to lawyers. When that effort failed, the ABA filed a lawsuit in the D.C. district court, where it prevailed. The FTC appealed and the matter has since been briefed, argued, and is awaiting a decision. However, the lawsuit has been rendered moot by action of Congress, which recently passed legislation exempting lawyers from the Rules. The Senate voted unanimously on Nov. 30 that lawyers and certain other professionals are not "creditors" for the purpose of the Rules, and on Dec. 7, the House of Representatives followed suit, resolving the issue once and for all. The appeal of the ABA's lawsuit is expected to be dismissed when the legislation is signed.
ABA President Steve Zack, commenting on the successful conclusion of the issue, stated, "At last, the American legal profession has clear and final relief from attempts to solve a non-existent problem that would have created paper-pushing and raised legal costs."
Published: Tue, Dec 14, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone