––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted December 20, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
U.S. Patent Office to open Detroit satellite site

DETROIT (AP) -- The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has picked Detroit as the place to open its first satellite facility.
Federal officials said last Thursday the new office could be open in mid-2011 with about 100 patent examiners and other employees.
Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said opening satellite offices away from the Washington area is part of the agency's strategy to become more efficient. It now takes about three years to approve or reject a patent application and officials want to cut that to one year.
Officials said Detroit was chosen because of the area's high percentage of scientists and engineers, including some with auto industry background. The region also has major research universities.
The agency expects to open offices in other regions later.
Published: Mon, Dec 20, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case