––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted December 31, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court petitioned by ABA to reconsider decision involving unanimous jury verdicts in criminal cases

The American Bar Association Monday filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court of the United States in support of the petitioner's request for a writ of certiorari in Troy Barbour v. State of Louisiana, in which the petitioner was convicted of attempted second degree murder by a less-than-unanimous jury verdict. The ABA specifically requests the high court reconsider Apodaca v. Oregon (1972), which held that the Constitution does not require unanimous jury verdicts for state criminal convictions.
The ABA urges reconsideration, in part, because one of the concurring justices in the Apodaca decision cited the association's 1968 Standards for Criminal Justice as supporting his conclusion that states could use non-unanimous criminal juries. But, the ABA notes, the standards were amended in 1976, based on intervening research, to state that jury verdicts should be unanimous in all criminal trials. The ABA has continuously affirmed this position over the last 30-plus years, most recently in 2005 in the report of its American Jury Project, ABA Principles for Juries and Jury Trials. The ABA also urges reconsideration because research has continued to show that non-unanimous jury verdicts in criminal trials "fail to foster thorough jury deliberation, attention to minority viewpoints or community confidence in jury verdicts." In its brief, the ABA therefore requests that the court conclude that criminal defendants in state jury trials should have the same right to a unanimous jury verdict as criminal defendants have in federal jury trials.
The brief is available online at www.abanet.org/media/nosearch/barbour_v_louisiana_122710.pdf
Published: Fri, Dec 31, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone