––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted December 31, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court petitioned by ABA to reconsider decision involving unanimous jury verdicts in criminal cases
The American Bar Association Monday filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court of the United States in support of the petitioner's request for a writ of certiorari in Troy Barbour v. State of Louisiana, in which the petitioner was convicted of attempted second degree murder by a less-than-unanimous jury verdict. The ABA specifically requests the high court reconsider Apodaca v. Oregon (1972), which held that the Constitution does not require unanimous jury verdicts for state criminal convictions.
The ABA urges reconsideration, in part, because one of the concurring justices in the Apodaca decision cited the association's 1968 Standards for Criminal Justice as supporting his conclusion that states could use non-unanimous criminal juries. But, the ABA notes, the standards were amended in 1976, based on intervening research, to state that jury verdicts should be unanimous in all criminal trials. The ABA has continuously affirmed this position over the last 30-plus years, most recently in 2005 in the report of its American Jury Project, ABA Principles for Juries and Jury Trials. The ABA also urges reconsideration because research has continued to show that non-unanimous jury verdicts in criminal trials "fail to foster thorough jury deliberation, attention to minority viewpoints or community confidence in jury verdicts." In its brief, the ABA therefore requests that the court conclude that criminal defendants in state jury trials should have the same right to a unanimous jury verdict as criminal defendants have in federal jury trials.
The brief is available online at www.abanet.org/media/nosearch/barbour_v_louisiana_122710.pdf
Published: Fri, Dec 31, 2010
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark