- Posted March 02, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
U.S. Supreme Court to decide on ownership of university patents
![](/Content/LegalNews/images/article_db_image1.jpg)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court is questioning whether patents on inventions that arise from federally funded research must go to the university where the inventor worked.
The court heard arguments Monday from lawyers from Stanford University, which wants the patents to technology for detecting HIV levels in a patient's blood.
The university said it owns the technology because its discoverer worked at Stanford. The 1980 Bayh-Dole Act allows universities to retain the rights to research funded by federal grants.
But pharmaceutical giant Roche says Stanford researcher Mark Holodniy also signed a contract that gave the company the patent to anything that resulted from their collaboration. A federal appeals court made Roche and Stanford co-owners.
The justices will make a decision by June.
The case is Stanford University v. Roche, 09-1159.
Published: Wed, Mar 2, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- SCOTUSblog founder Tom Goldstein accused of transferring millions in cryptocurrency after tax indictment
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Florida lawyer accused of stalking another attorney, texting rap songs with threatening lyrics
- Wisdom Through Face Paint: Documentary examines Juggalo gang allegations by DOJ
- No. 42 law firm by head count could face sanctions over fake case citations generated by ChatGPT
- Judge apologizes to slain jogger Ahmaud Arbery’s family after tossing charges against district attorney