- Posted March 04, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
SUPREMECOURTNOTEBOOK

Court says judges should
consider rehabilitation
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court says judges can consider an inmate's rehabilitation at resentencing, but they aren't bound by earlier court decisions.
Jason Pepper served 24 months for conspiring to distribute methamphetamines -- but then a different judge tacked on 41 more months, and Pepper went back to prison.
Pepper says the second judge should have been bound by the findings that the first judge used to determine the original sentence. Pepper also says the second judge should have given more weight to his post-incarceration rehabilitation, which included finding a steady job and getting married.
The Supreme Court now has sent back the case back to a lower court for resentencing.
The justices say judges aren't bound by previous sentencing decisions, but they should consider a person's rehabilitation.
Published: Fri, Mar 4, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone