- Posted March 14, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Local governments lose in Michigan tax case
By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) -- The Michigan Supreme Court said last Thursday that local governments are not allowed to increase the taxable value of some properties only because a joint owner has died.
The court said in a unanimous decision that death doesn't trigger a new valuation, or the resulting higher tax bills. It's a major ruling that will be celebrated by people who want to share a cottage or another property with someone without that co-owner later taking a financial hit.
Since Michigan voters approved Proposal A in 1994, the taxable value of a home can't go up much each year unless there's a new owner, typically through a sale.
The court's ruling came in the case of Nathan Klooster, who in 2004 was added as a joint tenant, or co-owner, of a modest house in Charlevoix in northern Michigan. When the other owner, Klooster's father, died the next year, the city treated it as a transfer of ownership and nearly doubled the taxable value. The Supreme Court said that was wrong.
Despite the ruling, the court said Charlevoix can raise the taxable value for other reasons.
"This changes the law in Michigan considerably," said Klooster's attorney, Steven Stapleton. "Mr. Klooster ultimately lost but the taxpayers win. For estate and trust purposes, this is a big deal."
A message seeking comment was left with Charlevoix's attorney.
The Michigan Municipal League and Michigan Assessors Association had warned the Supreme Court that local governments would suffer financially if joint ownerships like the one in the Klooster case could be used to keep property values capped. They fear "perpetual tax shelters."
Attorney Paul McCord, who filed a brief at the court on behalf of Michigan tax lawyers, doubts local governments will suffer much but said the decision is significant.
"Mom and dad could buy a cottage and hold it for 30-odd years and pass it to the next generation for 30 or more years. The value could stay capped," McCord said. "Up north, there are a lot of cottages -- and some are beyond cottages."
Published: Mon, Mar 14, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark