- Posted April 07, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court will take another look at Detroit ankle case

DETROIT (AP) -- The Michigan Supreme Court has reversed itself and will hear arguments about whether the city of Detroit is responsible for a broken ankle near the Detroit River.
The decision last week is a result of the court's new conservative majority. When the court had a liberal majority last fall, a decision in favor of Charles Williams was allowed to stand.
The issue is whether an exception to liability applies when someone is hurt away from a road. Williams broke his ankle on a pedestrian path controlled by Detroit, not a highway.
Williams' lawsuit has survived thanks to a 2010 decision by the state appeals court. Some conservatives on the Supreme Court have called it "illogical."
Published: Thu, Apr 7, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone