- Posted May 13, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
DOJ antitrust settlement with Microsoft expires
By Joelle Tessler
AP Technology Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The technology industry advances at lightning speed. So perhaps it's no surprise that the expiration of the Justice Department's historic antitrust settlement with software giant Microsoft passed with little fanfare on Thursday.
In an age of Apple iPhones, Google Web searches and Facebook friends, Microsoft Corp.'s control over the computer desktop through its Windows operating system might seem like last decade's monopoly.
But in a statement released Wednesday, the Justice Department said it believes the landmark case that it and 19 state attorneys general brought against Microsoft in 1998 helped open the computer industry to greater competition and innovation across the technology sector. The government credits a settlement reached after years of courtroom battles with creating market conditions that have allowed all sorts of new products and services -- from mobile devices to cloud computing -- to challenge Microsoft's powerful Windows computing platform.
At the heart of the Justice Department's case against Microsoft were charges that the company was using its monopoly control over the Windows operating system to extend its dominance into other markets, including the market for Web browsers. Among other things, the government charged that Microsoft violated antitrust law by requiring computer makers to use its Internet Explorer browser as a condition of licensing Windows, by prohibiting consumers and computer makers from removing the Internet Explorer browser from the Windows operating system and by preventing outside software programs from working with Windows.
The final settlement, which has been in effect since 2002, prohibited the company from engaging in such behavior. This has allowed software products such as Web browsers, media players and instant messaging software to flourish, the Justice Department said Wednesday.
For its part, Microsoft said it is happy to put the case behind it. "Our experience has changed us and shaped how we view our responsibility to the industry," the company said in a statement.
Published: Fri, May 13, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark