- Posted May 23, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court says conviction stands, despite tart-tongued jurors
DETROIT (AP) -- Jurors typically speak behind closed doors. So is it fair when two challenge a defense lawyer in open court?
A federal appeals court has refused to overturn the Detroit drug conviction of a man, even after a juror told the defense, "I don't want to hear that crap." Another said, "Don't insult my intelligence."
The comments came during closing arguments in the 2006 Wayne County Circuit Court trial of Antonio Tolbert, who was convicted and sentenced to at least 12 years in prison. He says comments by jurors violated his right to a fair trial.
But the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals said last Thursday it finds no legal precedent supporting Tolbert. The U.S. Supreme Court has never prohibited a juror who speaks once from staying in a trial.
Published: Mon, May 23, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Fighting Hallucinations: How to choose the right AI citation checkers
- Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored by court
- Federal judiciary raises concerns over deepfakes when opposing courtroom cameras
- Some law grads stack judicial clerkships, closing others out of coveted opportunity
- Luigi Mangione’s lawyers withdraw plan to use ‘mental defect’ defense for allegedly shooting UnitedHeathcare CEO
- Rule requiring jurists to visit jails promotes confidence in courts, chief judge says




