- Posted May 23, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court says conviction stands, despite tart-tongued jurors

DETROIT (AP) -- Jurors typically speak behind closed doors. So is it fair when two challenge a defense lawyer in open court?
A federal appeals court has refused to overturn the Detroit drug conviction of a man, even after a juror told the defense, "I don't want to hear that crap." Another said, "Don't insult my intelligence."
The comments came during closing arguments in the 2006 Wayne County Circuit Court trial of Antonio Tolbert, who was convicted and sentenced to at least 12 years in prison. He says comments by jurors violated his right to a fair trial.
But the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals said last Thursday it finds no legal precedent supporting Tolbert. The U.S. Supreme Court has never prohibited a juror who speaks once from staying in a trial.
Published: Mon, May 23, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone