- Posted May 23, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court says conviction stands, despite tart-tongued jurors
DETROIT (AP) -- Jurors typically speak behind closed doors. So is it fair when two challenge a defense lawyer in open court?
A federal appeals court has refused to overturn the Detroit drug conviction of a man, even after a juror told the defense, "I don't want to hear that crap." Another said, "Don't insult my intelligence."
The comments came during closing arguments in the 2006 Wayne County Circuit Court trial of Antonio Tolbert, who was convicted and sentenced to at least 12 years in prison. He says comments by jurors violated his right to a fair trial.
But the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals said last Thursday it finds no legal precedent supporting Tolbert. The U.S. Supreme Court has never prohibited a juror who speaks once from staying in a trial.
Published: Mon, May 23, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Judge is accused of using racial slur, vulgar terms and ‘libtard’ label for employee offended by his comments
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Colorado Supreme Court considers whether habeas petition can free zoo elephants
- 4th Circuit upholds $1M sanction for law firm that tried to ‘sabotage’ federal court’s authority
- Don’t give money to law schools unless they teach originalism, conservative federal appeals judge says
- Average BigLaw partner compensation increased 26% in 2 years, reaching this high-water mark