- Posted July 11, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court to hear Montana dams lawsuit

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court is entering a $40 million dispute between an energy company and Montana that could turn on the experiences of the Lewis and Clark expedition.
The justices recently said they will hear an appeal from PPL Montana of a state court decision ordering the company to pay $40 million in rent for placing its hydroelectric dams in riverbeds owned by the state.
The ownership of the waterways turns on whether they were navigable when Montana became a state in 1889. Both the company and the state base part of their argument on the journey of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark more than 200 years ago.
The state says that portions of three rivers that are in dispute have a history of navigation dating back to the expedition and Lewis' description of rivers that run through "such a mountainous country and at the same time are so navigable as they are."
The company points to accounts of the expedition's arduous portages of canoes and supplies around waterfalls to argue that the contested stretches of water were not navigable.
The case will be argued in the court's term that begins in October.
The case is PPL Montana v. Montana, 10-218.
Published: Mon, Jul 11, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Whitmer signs gun violence prevention legislation
- Department of Attorney General conducts statewide warrant sweep, arrests 9
- Adoptive families across Michigan recognized during Adoption Day and Month
- Reproductive Health Act signed into law
- Case study: Documentary highlights history of courts in the Eastern District
headlines National
- Oscar vs. Jeff: Trial lawyers and appellate counsel do different jobs, and it may show in their writing
- ‘Can a killer look like a granny?’ Prosecutor poses questions as mother-in-law of slain law prof goes on trial
- ILTACON 2025: The Wild, Wild West of legal tech
- After striking deal with Trump, this BigLaw firm worked with liberal groups to secure pro bono wins in 2 cases
- ‘Early decision conspiracy’ among top colleges is an antitrust violation, suit alleges
- Striking the Balance: How to make alternative fee arrangements work for everyone